psychosomatic. That boy needs therapy.

I trimmed my list. (And sent off appropriate notes to those that I felt obliged to remove, for one reason or another.) It’s sad, because I really liked those folks, but *TIME AND TIME AGAIN* there’s involvement with a LJ drama. That seems counterproductive. This whole “you’re friends with X, so you can’t be friends with Y” nonsense is right out of grade 2. So, forget it. I’m sure I’ll be adding some back later (If they’ll have me). but for now, I’m just not dealing with it. Lakme pulled that silly stuff with folks I liked reading last time around. I still sometimes wonder if she ever confessed in her journal to her colossal mistake, and character assassination. I figure the current hot air will stop blowing in a few days…. but it seems its the same group of people every time. I wonder if a more permanent decision isn’t more reasonable. A shame so many of them are so likeable. A couple of rotten apples wreck the party for everyone…(If I’m allowed to mix cliche & metaphor… it’s my journal. I’ll say yeah.)

Related Posts

  • 8342 – Q has the lowdown on what happened to LJ recently –May 5, 2006 8342 – Q has the lowdown on what happened to LJ recently – The dishonor of Blue Security There was quite a bit of teeth gnashing across […]
  • 7716 – I doubt it’s true.September 7, 2005 7716 – I doubt it’s true. I call shenanigans on interdictor 's latest post. It sounds *a lot* like his old […]
  • 6945  – pager-spamOctober 18, 2004 6945 – pager-spam Here's a darling bit of anony-messaging via the LJ text feature ( […]
  • October 2, 2003 Well, prop2 is losing a lot of her sympathy credit in the office. She called at 9am this […]
  • September 6, 2002 update- it's over already - […]

Leave a Reply